‘You can’t reason with a very young child. The only way to make them change their behaviour is to use rewards or punishment!’ These are sentiments I often hear, or read, when there is a discussion on disciplining small children.
However, my experience as both a parent, and parent educator, is that when given the chance, young children can respond impressively to empathy, explanation and reasoning. They can even join us in problem solving.
Sometimes, I wonder if we, unintentionally, restrict the ability of our very young children to show us their full potential, because we are hampered by developmental expectations, or the expectations and judgements of others.
I’ve been practicing a style of parenting known variously as peaceful, respectful, or gentle parenting for 20 plus years – since my children were babies. This approach involves communicating to connect with children, and not using rewards or punishment.
As a new mother, I attended a parent education course, Parent Effectiveness Training (P.E.T.), and my whole paradigm on how to be a parent was challenged. I learned respectful relationship skills including active listening, assertiveness (using I-messages), and no-lose conflict resolution. I learned not to think of my children as ‘misbehaving’. Instead, I saw them as ‘behaving to meet a need’ (Thomas Gordon).
In my view, these skills help children develop essential life qualities such as resilience, empathy and self-regulation (explored further in ‘How the Evidence of Today Supports the Wisdom of Yesterday. )
After attending the parenting course, I leapt into implementing the skills on as many occasions as possible, from babyhood to adulthood. Unimpeded by expectations of what children should or should not be able to understand, I naively put into practice the P.E.T. communication skills. I understood that although babies were people, they were not miniature adults. They would need to develop in stages, both physically and psychologically.
My communication attempts did not always result in the change of behaviour I’d envisioned, and it was not always immediate. Sometimes I found that other, non-verbal skills, such as modifying the environment, were more appropriate.
What I did discover by implementing the skills, however, was how often I underestimated the abilities of my children.
All I needed to do was trust the power of respectful words, and the potential of a child.
Employing these skills and principles throughout the lives of my children has helped us, I believe, to enjoy a warm relationship, and they are now respectful and compassionate contributors to society.
I saw such value in the approach that I have taught PET for the past couple of decades.
I am not a ‘perfect parent’ – just ask my children! I have found, though, that if I parent with respectful intent and see my children as capable, innocent, and acting out of need, my expectations are largely met.
This is when I listen to a child, so they can talk about their unhappiness. I try to guess their feelings, and the reason they feel that way. I put these into a statement such as “You’re feeling . . . because . . . ”. For example “Sounds like you’re feeling frustrated because your toy truck’s wheels fell off”.
Careful listening can help children find a solution to their own problem.
Missing Mummy
My daughter, Emma* had just turned two. I had gone away for the weekend, leaving her with her Daddy. This was the first time I had left her overnight. We had tried to prepare her, but she had no idea what it would really mean for me to be away from her. I flew off on Saturday morning.
Saturday night was a difficult night for Emma’s Dad. At four am she woke up, distressed, and demanded to go to the airport. Daddy girded himself, and did a lot of active listening.
Daddy: "You're really missing Mummy. You're sad Mummy's not here".
Emma settled for a while, and then become upset again, and wanted to go to the airport. She wanted to wear her pink stockings, her pink dress and her orange shoes, because that’s what she’d worn when she took Mummy to the airport.
Eventually, Daddy got her dressed in her pink stockings, her pink dress and her orange shoes. Then they sat on the bed and had a talk. Daddy realised that she had no idea of what "flying away on a plane" meant.
Daddy: “Mummy’s gone on the plane, and the plane has gone to another place, and that’s where Mummy is. She’s in another city. Mummy is going to get into another plane, and fly back. We’re going to go back to the airport and pick her up today.”
That was all Emma needed to know. She lay down on the bed, in her pink stockings, her pink dress and her orange shoes, and went off to sleep.
Emma had not understood why I was not there with her, after going in the plane. So, to help her in her upset, firstly Daddy listened to his daughter. This validated her, and helped her move from her emotions to her cognition. He was then able to reason with his two-year-old, at 4am in the morning, to the point where she could sleep.
A three part I-message looks something like this: “when . . .(describe child’s behaviour) I feel . . .(a feeling word) because . . . (describe how you have been affected) “. For example “When I see the toys on the floor, I feel concerned that I might step on them and hurt myself”.
I use I-Messages when my needs are not being met, and I'd like my child to help me.
18 Month Old and Sticky Hands.
This example came from a participant in one of my classes, who had an 18-month-old daughter. Mum was initially quite sceptical about how much her daughter would understand if she implemented the P.E.T. communication skills, as her daughter was so young.
One morning, her daughter wanted to eat an orange. Mum was not keen.
Mum: “I’m worried that if you eat that orange, your hands will get all dirty. Then you might want to hug Mummy, and my nice clean clothes will get dirty from the orange”
Her daughter initiated her own solution, taking into account Mum’s concerns. She bent forward, with her hands stuck straight out behind her, and began to eat the orange with only her mouth, straight off the plate! This way, she could eat the orange, avoid getting her hands dirty, and keep her Mum’s dress clean.
Sometimes, even after my best I-messages (followed by Active Listening), I discover that both of us are still feeling dissatisfied. That is, we both have needs that are not being met. This is when I try Problem Solving,: “What can we do so that we’re both feeling OK?”
25 Month Old Friends Problem Solving Together
Emma was aged two years and one month. She was playing with a friend of hers, who was one week older. Holly* sat on a small bottom-sized-box, reading a book. Emma wanted to sit on Holly’s box, and read Holly’s story. So I ‘modified the environment’ by finding a different box for Emma to sit on, with a different book, and she seemed to accept the solution. Then Holly got off her seat, and went out of the room to find some toys.
Emma promptly swapped seats, and sat on Holly's tiny box and read Holly’s book. Holly returned. She was very unhappy to see Emma on her seat. She began to talk to Emma, asking her to sit on the other seat.
Holly: "This is Emma's, this is Holly's. Sit here".
Emma shook her head, and did not move.
Emma: “Mine, mine!” pointing to Molly’s box, on which Emma was sitting.
This conversation continued for a little while, with neither child changing their mind. As I didn't want the argument to escalate, I went over to the girls to try and help them resolve their disagreement. My role was to act as a mediator. I was acutely aware of being observed by Holly’s mother, as I tried to put into practice this approach to parenting that I not only practiced, but also taught!
I initiated the principles of resolving sibling conflict.
Mum: "Emma, Holly would like to sit on her box, and when she can't she's sad. Look how sad Holly is.”
Emma looked at the book in her hands instead.
Emma: “Mine!”
Mum: “You like sitting on Holly’s box reading her book”.
Emma (nodding): “Mine”
Mum (trying to initiate a solution by suggesting a substitute behaviour): “How about you sit on the other box?"
Emma (shaking her head): “Mine!”
Mum: "You like sitting on that box. I'm concerned that Holly will be sad if she can't sit on her box".
Emma still would not move. At this point, I was desperate. I would not use a punishment or a bribe (reward). I recognised there was a conflict, and it was my child’s behaviour that was causing the problem. The pressure was intense.
I’d used the skills I thought would work to resolve the problem. The only skill left in my tool-kit was no-lose conflict resolution. However, I was doubtful that problem solving would work, as the children were too young. How could they come up with a solution at just 25 months? I’d already suggested all the solutions I could think of, and they’d been rejected. I had to give it a go.
I took a deep breath, and trusted in the process and the children.
Mum: "Emma, can you think of anything that would make Holly happy and you happy?"
At this, Emma sat up.
Emma (in a big, loud voice): "uuummmm, Holly . . .?" Then she pointed to a miniscule space next to her, on the tiny box on which she sat.
Emma: "Holly here - next me!"
Mum: "You would like Holly to sit next to you?"
Emma nodded. I looked at Holly
Mum: "Holly, would you like to sit next to Emma?"
Holly nodded. The two toddlers then proceeded to make room for each other on the one very small seat. After a few seconds, they discovered there wasn’t really any room, and Emma then moved happily away from the box.
Holly's Mum and I were blown away by what had just happened. These two little girls had just successfully resolved a conflict, where both won! The solution suggested by Emma was never on my radar. At a very young age, these children were learning to: a) consider other people; and b) creatively find a no-lose solution.
My children have been my greatest teachers. Over more than 20 years of being a parent, I have discovered that I continually underestimated the abilities of my children. The parents I’ve met through my parenting classes have similarly been amazed by the capacities of their young ones, when presented the opportunity.
Becoming aware of developmental expectations, while at the same time avoiding the limitations of strict developmental borders, allowed me to implement a respectful communication skills approach.
I encourage you to open up to the possibilities of communicating with very young children. Help them discover their full potential!
*Not their real names
This article has been has been updated from a blog published in The Spoke. The articles below contain further examples of gentle parenting in action with young children.
Reasoning with a very young child (1): it’s really possible!
Reasoning with a very young child (2): when your child is unhappy
Reasoning with a very young child (3): when parents are unhappy with their child’s behaviour
Reasoning with a very young child (4): when both parent and child are unhappy.
5th July 2015; updated 4th July 2017. Image:Canva
© Larissa Dann. 2015, 2017. All rights reserved
Leave a comment